Geoscience BC Releases Comprehensive Guide for BC Communities on Development of Direct-Use Geothermal

Geoscience BC today launched its Direct-Use Geothermal Roadmap, a detailed guide for communities and companies to assist them assess and develop local geothermal energy jobs to promote financial advancement and lower greenhouse gas emissions. Latest green house ideas can be found here.

” Direct-use geothermal energy resources are considerably underutilized in BC,” stated Carlos Salas, Vice President, Energy, at Geoscience BC. “From this study we found there was a substantial lack of understanding at the community level about the variety of direct-use geothermal applications and the required steps required to develop local geothermal resources. The Direct-Use Geothermal Roadmap supplies beneficial info needed by neighborhoods to assist them in examining, planning and pursuing geothermal tasks.”

The Direct-Use Geothermal Roadmap contains useful standards for neighborhoods on geothermal surface exploration, land acquisition and allowing, drilling and testing wells needed for the design and advancement of direct-use geothermal resources in BC. The summary report and digital information are available here: Geoscience BC Report 2016-07: Direct-Use Geothermal Resources in British Columbia.

To support the release of the Roadmap, Geoscience BC is preparing a series of neighborhood workshops helped with by lead scientist Dr. Catherine Hickson, Principal of Tuya Terra Geo Corp. The very first of these workshops will be a discussion to the BC Union of Municipalities in September. This discussion will be followed by local workshops which will provide information and tools on how neighborhoods move forward with direct-use geothermal jobs, resolving technical and non-technical elements of advancement.

fDirect-use geothermal energy utilizes thermal waters with temperatures normally less than 80 degrees C. Traditional usages of these warm waters have actually been for space heating and medical spa applications. Direct-use water temperatures and flow rates are considered too low to financially create electricity. Possible direct-use geothermal energy applications include commercial, industrial and residential space heating, aquaculture, greenhouses, crop drying, snow-melting and recreational applications. Although BC has substantial potential, direct-use geothermal is presently just utilized for leisure and therapeutic functions such as warm springs.

A total of 63 neighborhoods were identified as being located close to the 18 areas deemed beneficial for direct-use geothermal. This list of localities was subsequently narrowed down to 11 regions and neighborhoods which researchers deemed to have the finest capacity for direct-use geothermal development in BC., 80 km north of Vancouver near Squamish.

In many cases, direct-use geothermal had not even been considered in the neighborhood preparation procedure. This Direct-Use Geothermal Roadmap will assist fill those understanding gaps and play an essential function in assisting BC communities examine and pursue practical geothermal jobs with the most promising economic capacity.”

To find out more on Geoscience BC’s geothermal tasks, please visit our Direct-Use Geothermal Resources Project page.

g

About Geoscience BC

Geoscience BC is an independent, non-profit company that produces earth science info in collaboration with First Nations, regional communities, governments, academia and the resource sector. This vital details are offered to the general public to encourage investment in sustainable resource projects and enable informed resource management choices for the benefit of all British Columbians. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the province of British Columbia.


New methane policies a pricey error

Bureaucrats have been given another political target in their misdirected war on fossil fuels methane.

Methane emissions occur throughout the natural gas market. They originate from regular operations and maintenance as well as due to unintentional and irregular leaks and equipment venting.

f

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) final rule on brand-new, modified and reconstructed sources of methane from the oil and gas sector, unveiled on May 12, becomes part of the Obama administrations battle to stop climate change. The EPA state that the rules will add about $530 million in extra expenses on the sector annually by 2025. Business will have to upgrade pumps and compressors, and expand using technology developed to catch methane that can be launched by newly fracked wells. The costs of exploring, producing, and providing gas will all increase, most likely driving many little oil and gas manufacturers out of business and further threatening America’s energy security.

The 2014 research study conducted by the American consulting firm ICF International that was utilized to validate the EPA regulations projected an expense of $0.66 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of methane lowered.

Since then, gas costs have actually dropped considerably, making it far less appealing for business to collect the lost gas for sale. ICF re-run their research study. And exactly what they have actually discovered is staggering.

In their June 2 report, ICF showed that the expense to decrease methane emissions from natural gas systems is now $3.35/ thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of methane reduced, about five times the initial quote.

aRichard Hyde, interim executive director of ONE Future, the union of natural gas business that sponsored ICF s newest work, explains, this new research study supplies cost price quotes of methane reduction innovations that are more constant with existing market truths.

Oil and gas industry leaders state that methane policies are not needed since the sector is already minimizing emissions on their own. However, they do not raise the most vital point: any rules limiting methane are almost certainly meaningless from a climate change viewpoint. Our knowledge about the impact of methane emissions on climate is far too immature to warrant the imposition of crippling costs on the sector.

The EPA leads the deceptiveness. They specify on their Website.

Methane is the second most common greenhouse gas discharged in the United States from human activities…

This is the deceptive since it disregards water vapor. The EPA does this because the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) overlooks it. The IPCC concluded that, while people produce water vapor (for instance, from tanks), the quantity is so little relative to the total in the atmosphere (water vapor is 95% of all greenhouse gases by volume while carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) are 4% and 0.36% respectively) that our production is of no effect.

They can’t perhaps know this because we lack even remotely precise steps of overall atmospheric water vapor or how much it differs in space in time.

When climate alarmists finally acknowledged that there was a ceiling to the warming capacity of CO2, they needed a brand-new paradigm to continue the climate scare. The brand-new hypothesis sounded feasible: as the atmosphere warms due to increasing CO2 levels, evaporation rates increase which magnify the expected CO2-induced warming. In turn that results in more evaporation and so on; simply puts, a favorable feedback.

Issue was, the hypothesis was quickly debunked by researchers in the field.

The EPA insurance claims: Globally, over 60% of overall CH4 emissions come from human activities.

Such confidence is illogical. It was just in 2006 that scientists found that rain forests are a significant, previously uncounted, source of methane. Similarly, in 2010, it was found for the very first time that a wide area of Arctic Ocean seabed is bubbling methane into the atmosphere.

If one is uncertain about the quantity of methane coming from natural sources, as indeed we are, you can’t identify the relative significance of the human contribution. And if one cannot determine our relative contribution, then another pillar supporting climate modification alarm crumbles.

cThe White House web site explains the Obama administration s reason for oppressive measures to decrease methane emissions:

Decreasing methane emissions is a powerful way to act on climate modification.

The EPA estimates the costs of their brand-new methane guidelines will be offset by $690 million a year in cost savings by 2025 from avoiding extreme storms, floods and other repercussions of climate change.

This is ludicrous. Even if it were appropriate that methane emissions from human activities is a vital driver of climate change, EPA regulations are approximated to lower global warming only 0.002 C by century’s end. Such a quantity is too small to even be determined, not to mention have any impact on climate-related events.

This is worse than pseudo-science, it is purposeful deception to produce science for a political agenda. The next president must end this pricey charade.

Dr. Tim Ball is an ecological expert and former climatology teacher at the University of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Tom Harris is executive director of the Ottawa, Canada-based International Climate Science Coalition.


Green roofs: design solution or a garden overhead

Green roofs were utilized by our forefathers in ancient times. In Scandinavia and Central Asia, the roofs were covered by grass and moss in order to accomplish heat insulation and to offer water flow. In 20th century roofing system gardens got special development and appeal in the USA and Europe. We will tell you how and for what functions they are utilized.

d

It is known from the history that our ancestors located the ground on the straw roofing’s to enhance seclusion and to reduce a risk of real estate fire. Ancient Romans utilized such balconies for the placement of plants and flower pots, along with contemporaries of Victorian age arranged entire greenhouses on their roofs.

Concerning our times green roofing’s are acquiring more popularity in cities of Western Europe where city citizens feel severe lack of space. That is why a green garden on the roofing is a natural outlet for such settlements.

By the method, in Europe green roofing’s are produced not only on the roofing’s of ordinary houses but also on the roofing’s of various public places, which inspires some citizens to make such a development the part of their villa.

eSarah S. Khodeir believes that green roofing’s are an exceptional perspective for advancement of a brand-new sphere of green construction and creating and also that this is what makes the town truly stunning.

Naturally the process of producing of such a development is not so easy. You should accurately approach to the production of siol layor of high quality, water disposal system and other essential things.

All of this worth the difficulty because as well as having such benefits as durability, exceptional noise and heat insulation, rainfall retention, enhancing of environmental climate, free space, they also serve as a terrific design of the house.


Please wait...

Subscribe to our newsletter

Want to be notified when our article is published? Enter your email address and name below to be the first to know.